South Bayview Bulldog Admin

Double Summer Time will add to jet lag

The British government is considering a return to a wartime phenomenon, British Double Summer Time. This is a time zone that is two hours ahead of Greenwich Mean Time. But the plan also calls for Britain to keep permanent daylight saving time for the rest of year, eliminating Greenwich Time altogether. It is part of the coalition government’s European tourist strategy, which is due to be published this week. Under the scheme, clocks will go forward an hour from Greenwich Mean Time in the winter and a further hour in the summer, leading to lighter summer evenings and darker mornings. Travellers from the Eastern Time Zone (Toronto, New York etc) may not like it. They will have to adjust to a six hour time difference rather than the usual five. Supporters claim Britain’s tourism industry would earn millions extra from the move, as well as saving thousands of tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions as people turn their lights on later. Conservative MP Rebecca Harris said it would extend the tourist season and boost the economy by up to £3.5 billion a year. However, opponents insist it will make life more difficult for farmers who rise early as well as children travelling to school.

This tricky Democracy thing

Every night on the news people who are protesting in the streets of Arabia are called pro-Democracy. Maybe they are. But if you define Democracy at its core as a social and cultural commitment to play by the rules about how power is to be exchanged, well then, maybe these rioters are only looking for a a quick fix to a lousy life. Nothing wrong with that kind of wish, but it doesn’t have anything to do with even a bare capacity to practice Democracy. In China, where there is a widely civilized and educated population, Democracy would appear to have a pretty good chance. The protesters call their mission The Jasmine Revolution. Nice name. But as is usually the case in China, word searches are carefully monitored and this week, all you get for a “Jasmine” search is a bounce back.

A finger lickin part of our culture

It was unhygienic, rude and gross, but Finger Lickin Good became part of our culture. The slogan is 60 years old now and it’s being replaced by a new slogan So Good. KFC tells the story that Finger Lickin Good was created by accident when franchisee David Harman appeared in the background of a U.S. TV commercial licking his digits. Afterward, a concerned viewer phoned a company manager who said, “Well, it’s finger lickin’ good.” It stuck and over time inspired music and a parody (right) among many other things.

“You with the car — give me your money”.

So it appears that in at least one city, unlike Toronto, officials finally admit the truth about parking tickets. In San Francisco “parking tickets” are intended to raise as much money as quickly as possible. Parking officers have been instructed to ticket, ticket ticket without regard to anything else. The budget is in crisis and all that matters is grabbing dough as quickly as possible. Parking? Phooey. The only goal is to get money out of anybody who happens to be driving a car or maybe is even standing near one. Parking tickets in San Francisco are $65 incidentally. Of course, in Toronto, the tattered charade goes on that parking tickets are about parking.

Kids help the Anglican food bank

These young volunteers are busy delivering the left over bread and buns from COBS on South Bayview to the Anglican Church Flemingdon Park Food Bank. Elizabeth 7, Sarah 13 and Kamal 12 are part of a large group from St. Cuthbert’s Anglican Church who regularly pick up food from COBS and Epi Breads and with their parents, deliver it to the food bank. On this occasion, Steve and Diane were at the wheels of their SUVs for the job. They are the parents of Sarah and Elizabeth. Sarah and Kamal are students at Hodgson Senior Public School. Diane Goldie is Co-Chair with Indra Prashad of the school council.

Loud commercials — have your say

The government regulator has picked up the challenge of loud TV commercials again. It’s a perennial complaint but, unlike in the U.S., has never resulted in legislation in Canada. For decades broadcasters have fudged the issue by saying the peak loudness of programming and commercials was the same. It was merely that the commercials had more peaks. Uh-huh. Anyway, you can have your say by gong to the CRTC online. Read about how.
l