The Bulldog

Moore Park’s Terry Fallis wins 2nd Leacock humour prize

The celebrated humorist and Moore Park resident Terry Fallis has won the 2015 Stephen Leacock Medal for Humour for his book No Relation. It chronicles the dilemma of a man who is burdened with the name Ernest Hemingway.  This is the fourth time Fallis was nominated for the award. He won it in 2008 for The Best Laid Plans and was shortlisted in 2011 for The High Road and again in 2013 for Up and Down. The prize is a medal and $15,000 in cash from the TD Financial Group. Mr. Fallis,  of Welland Ave., told the Toronto Star that it felt just as good to win a second time as the first. The writer is said to have another book in the works for Fall release. 

Uber love puppies are — um — out to lunch in Toronto

“Please, please, please! Desperately trying to get puppies to the office today! No luck yet” Such is the agonized begging on Twitter of the puppy-less during Uber Taxi’s promotion. Uber offered to deliver a puppy “on demand”  to any office for 15 minutes. Anyway, take a  look at the Twitter super-trend where Uber has had to put up a post that says all its doggies are being snuggled right now. Thus, none can be delivered to you during this one-day promotion for the taxi firm. Twitter 

Sunnybrook: Young mother speaks forcefully from the heart

meeting-kate-text

At the well-attended information meeting about the proposed redevelopment of Sunnybrook Plaza, one impressive speaker was Kate Whitehead. She is a mother of three who lives on  Bessborough Dr. in North Leaside. Ms Whitehead has opened a Facebook page which following that meeting on April 28, 2015 has been receiving reaction to her forcefully delivered remarks. The South Bayview Bulldog has reprinted Kate Whitehead’s remarks below 

The proposed high-rise at Sunnybrook Plaza threatens the very fabric of our community. Leaside is not downtown Toronto. Anyone who has driven downtown, with all of the massive high-rise development occurring there, may have noticed the same thing I have.  The city is getting dark.  As walls of condos fill in every available space in the streetscape one is left with an impression that they are driving through a tunnel.  A tunnel where every building looks the same.  A tunnel that blocks out the sun.

Leaside is not downtown Toronto.  Leaside is a community where children can ride their bikes to their soccer games at Leaside high.  It is a place where you can grow a garden.  It is a place where you know your neighbors.  It is a place where, during the ice storm, a group of neighbors spontaneously arranged themselves to walk the streets with willing hands and saws to clear the debris from people’s lawns.  It is a safe place to retire.  It is a safe place to raise a family.  If developments like this one are allowed to proceed, this will end.  It will end and with it will go something that is very valuable to the residents of the entire city.  Something that makes Toronto somewhere you would want to live.

Do we want Leaside to simply become part of the tunnel?  It seems to me that the city is in an ever accelerating process of abolishing neighborhoods in favor of streamlined, profit maximized, large-scale development.  In so doing new housing goes up quickly and at great profit to developers, but at what cost?  It seems to me that citizens of this city will have few alternatives to large-scale developments.  There will be no place like Leaside left for people who find themselves wanting such an alternative.  If we pave communities like Leaside over with condos, there will be no turning back.

I can see why someone would want to buy a condo in Leaside.  I can almost envision the promotional material that RioCan will produce.  There will be pictures of families playing in the park, pictures of tree lined streets.  An invitation to be part of the vibrant community that is Leaside.  The irony is this.  The concept that will be promoted in those cheery brochures is the very thing that will be destroyed by the development.  Developers like Rio-Can will have been successful in selling out two groups of citizens.  Those whose neighborhood has been lost and those who thought they were moving to the Leaside of old.

  I’m sure many other people will highlight what we already know.  Large-scale developments like this will clog an already gridlocked Bayview where development is intensifying all the way up to the 401 with no new infrastructure planned.  Increased traffic will spill in to the residential streets.  Overcrowded schools will become more overcrowded.    These concepts almost seem to lose their significance in their repetition.  I think of it on a more personal level.  What does adding this level of density do for the average person in Leaside?  It means a parent spending part of the evening stuck in Bayview traffic rather than being home with their family.  It means a teenager going to an overcrowded high school and getting a strained education.  It means a 7-year-old riding his bike down the sidewalk and getting hit by a car.

Members of the community participated in the Eglinton connects consultations.  We are not naïve.  We know that, with the LRT, and with the growing population of the city, that some development is coming.  Putting a midrise on the site of Sunnybrook plaza, even WITH the current bylaws will change the neighborhood and be difficult for many members of the community. But with the ink still dry on the new bylaws, Riocan proposes to ignore them and ask for more.  This begs the question what is the purpose of a bylaw in the first place?  It is not a platform for upward negotiation.  It is a limit.  It is a negotiated limit.  It is a statement of collaboration between the city, business, and citizens.

If I look at the diagram of the proposed development I see some very clear demarcations.  The 8 story base upon which the two towers sit is the kind of building that was envisioned for this corner by the Connects collaboration.  Those 8 stories WITHOUT the two towers are what we, the community, thought we were agreeing to when we actively participated in making a development plan in light of the LRT.  This is what RioCan can build if it respects the community and the bylaws.

The 8 story building (still larger that what was originally envisioned for the block and a significantly larger structure than what is there now)  represents a compromise and a win win solution.  It provides a mixed use building.  It provides a building in keeping with the proposed new streetscape of Bayview and Eglinton. It provides intensification and new taxpayers.  It will undoubtedly provide a more than reasonable profit for RioCan.

So let’s look at the towers.  What is the benefit of 7 full stories on top of the maximum allowed (even by the most liberal definition)?  The downsides I have already mentioned and are numerous. I would argue there is no benefit to the community, either those of us who are already here or those of us who are coming.  Who are benefits is RioCan.  Only RioCan. I challenge them to outline a benefit to the towers other than profit.

In the last election, the Toronto Star noted that our community had more “SLOW DOWN” child safety signs than election signs.  We are a community who is united on the common cause of safety for our children and preservation of our streets.  We are engaged and we are able and we are invested. We have the power to harness the potential of the community and we will.  We believe Leaside is worth preserving for our children.

We will oppose allowing Leaside to be an extension of the wall of condos stretching out a shadow from lake Ontario. Why is RioCan proposing 19 stories?  I think it is audacious and they are floating it to see if we are complacent enough to let them get away with it.  RioCan, we are not.

Let’s put aside unreasonable and unworkable plans.  I would ask RioCan and the city to listen to the community and respect the bylaws.  Let’s work together to find a win win situation that we all can support.  Lets collaborate to build a Leaside that both present and future Leasiders can be proud of and flourish in. Lets demand “Right Sized”  (not Might Sized) development.

Fuss over security guards is from “Inside City Hall”

Fiona Crean, the City Ombud, has produced a report saying that the City’s security staff acted more like personal security for the mayor during the tenure of Rob Ford. She says the City’s management was slow to react as Ford evidently directed guards to protect him from the media when he was drunk. Sure. It was crummy and a disgrace to the City. But Ford is gone and make no mistake, he was the problem. Few security guards would dare tell the elected mayor of Toronto to take his problems elsewhere. What’s the point of this report? Inside Baseball meet Inside City Hall.

UN chief Moon trumps tubby tyrant on Putin guest list

Who’s invited and who’s not. The tubby tyrant of Pyongyang is not — invited to Moscow that is, for the commemoration of the victory of Soviet forces over Germany. But Ban Ki Moon, the South Korean patrician who is also the head of the United Nations is invited. Really not a surprise especially since Moon no doubt told Putin that he would be staying in Manhattan if that worm Kim Jung-un was invited

Life in the Big City: Teen shot and Chief beset on carding

leg-map

Town houses on Empringham

On a day when the new Police Chief, Mark Saunders, met with members of the African Canadian Summit there was a sniper-type shooting in the Malvern neighborhood of Scarborough. Call it life in the Big City. A boy, 15, who is being stone cold silent with the cops about who shot him was hit in a leg. Police are looking for suspects in the drive-by gun play. It happened near some town houses on Empringham Drive. The shooters didn’t even bother to get out their black car. It is assumed they know the injured youth. Back at the African Summit, Chief Saunders was assailed for saying that the elimination of the practice of carding is not the answer to safer streets and in fact, said the chief, it would lead to more crime. These remarks set fire to a tinderbox of anger about racism and human rights at the Summit. As is frequently the case, there was no  reportage today about whether carding as it practiced by the Toronto Police actually works, although the chief seems to think that it does.