Notable Canadians appointed to Order of Canada
by
•First Nation blocks Montreal-Toronto VIA line
by
•Oddjects at 1643 South Bayview closes
by
•Mark Carney business newsmaker of the year
by
•Fear? disgust? disbelief? Feel the fiscal fiasco
by
•
|
Woman with flu-like symptoms dies on Via train
by
•Let’s make Laird Drive Midtown’s new auto alley
by
•Service five minutes away |
You only have to ask most car owners in and around South Bayview to learn how much they resent the lack of automobile sales and service in our area. The collapse of 2008 caused a near blood bath among local dealers — Yonge Toyota, Brennan’s on Bayview, Roy Foss at Eglinton and Brentcliffe — all gone. The promising new auto sales centre on the site of the railway lands vanished with the bankruptcy of General Motors. But still we have the old standby, Gyro Mazda, on Laird Drive and this company is also wisely expanding to create a Hyundai dealership at Laird and Industrial St. across the road from the Mazda outlet. This is excellent news for all South Bayview and leads the way for business, municipal and federal leaders to bring more car dealerships to the dormant industrial lands on the east side of Laird Drive. And the wisest course, in our view, would be to forget about the cash-strapped and top-heavy American-based firms like GM and Ford. Emphasis should be on manufacturers with less developed systems. Hyundai and its Korean cousin KIA come to mind. But there are car makers in China, India and Europe who should be encouraged to take a look at Laird Drive. Those who settle here will be able to tap a rich market of households whose car owners are fed up with driving to Front Street or Steeles Ave for service. It is frequently said that Hyundai is determined to break into the North American market by building better and more stylish cars. In the case of Gyro Hyundai on Laird, it will also be going where the business is located. May it prosper.
Woman, 21, gets court order against parents
by
•Music/drama student Aubrey Ireland |
Outrage at Russian ban on adoptions to the U.S.
by
•Moms outnumber dads 4:1 on parental dating site
by
•Can newspapers ever recover lost revenue?
by
•Can this sign save the Globe? |
The Globe and Mail has a lot at stake in its recent effort to get people to pay for reading the newspaper online. The desperate measure of showing readers an image asking them to pay, rather than showing the story, has become known in the industry as the paywall. Today the Globe is thumping the paywall tub again starting off with a brave little conceit that Apocalyptic Mayans didn’t see the end of the world, but they are seeing the end of news for free online. Then there ‘s U.S. commentator Dana Blankenhorn who says investors should short the New York Times because its paywall — and paywalls everywhere — haven’t got a chance. Blankenhorn says paywalls are only a temporary fix. He quotes Matt Ingram of GigaOm as saying that the Times is only maintaining with its paywalls, not prospering. “The paywall acts like sandbags against the flood. They keep the floodwaters out but they don’t stop the rising water. In the case of newspapers, this flood is an unsustainable business model. As Clay Shirky noted, in the debate over the Washington Post adding a paywall, sites like Homicide Watch cover every killing in the area, with a staff of two, while the Post newsroom has dozens of reporters but just covers a handful of cases a year. As Shirky wrote at his own blog last year a newspaper is a bundle, but the nature of the online world is to tear such bundles apart. The easy part of a paywall is getting money from 2% of your audience, he adds. The harder part is replacing 98% of your advertising business.”