45 search results for "court of appeal toronto"

City Council will take Better Local Government Act to SCOC

Toronto Council will fight the provincial law that cut its size from 47 to 25 members all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada. The City was given an incentive to make the appeal by a surprise split decision on the part of the Ontario Court of Appeal a week ago. Three justices relied on the Constitutional declaration that municipalities are “the creatures” of the provinces. Thus they ruled, Queen’s Park had an absolute right to enact the Better Local Government Act slicing Council essentially in half. But two judges roamed into the land of rights and concluded that the Ford government move, launched in the middle of an election campaign, was unconstitutional because it violated the rights of candidates.

Do prisoners “rights” exceed our duty to keep them alive?

The Supreme Court has responded to the awful truth about an end to solitary confinement in Canadian Prisons. Namely, that it will lead to the death of prisoners who are determined to hurt or kill either themselves or others. Prisoner isolation was declared unconstitutional 18 months ago by the Ontario Court of Appeal in a decision that would have become effective Monday. The high court Sunday set aside that deadline at the urging of the federal government to permit a full hearing on the issue. Recent years have seen ferocious lobbying by many groups as well as an emotional campaign by the Toronto Star to end so-called administrative isolation. In its request to set aside the deadline, the government warned that banning solitary confinement without a practical alternative in place would create a dangerous situation in prisons. Indeed, it isn’t difficult to imagine wholesale bloodshed caused by persons who are legally sane but dangerously violent. Colin Perkel, Canadian Press.

City hurls Hail Mary ball in effort to defeat 25-ward Council

The City of Toronto will be in the Ontario Court of Appeal Monday and Tuesday asking it to strike down legislation by which the Ford government reduced Council from 47 wards to 25. The difficulty, as was shown on a previous effort to invalidate the government’s action, is that the Constitution gives provinces the clear authority to do pretty much anything they want when it comes to municipalities. It doesn’t matter how unfair or even stupid it may seem to reasonable people The old saying that the municipalities are the creatures of the provinces applies. Media are reporting that the proceedings will be live-streamed but no link is provided. The CBC says it is installing the court cameras. CBC

Matlow urges SCOC fight, “charter” freedom from Ontario

Councillor Josh Matlow, running in the new Ward 12 (St. Paul’s), is urging the City to find ways in which it can appeal lower court decisions to approve the Ontario government’s legislation to reduce the size of Toronto Council. He says the fight should be taken to the Supreme Court of Canada if necessary. He also proposes federal legislation to permit Toronto, and other Canadian municipaltiies, independence from the current constitutional provision which makes municipalities creatures of the provinces. He describes such a provision as a City Charter.

Matlow urges SCOC fight, “charter” freedom from Ontario

Newsletter from Councillor Josh Matlow on Friday, September 21, 2018

As many of you have already heard, a panel of Ontario Appeals Court judges granted the province a ‘stay’ on Doug Ford’s Bill 5. This development means that Toronto will have a 25 Ward election as there is no legal avenue left, that I am aware of, that could overrule this decision before Torontonians go to the polls on October 22nd.

It is important to note that this fight, however, is not over. My motion, approved by City Council, directs the City Solicitor to “exhaust all legal avenues”. If a decision sanctioning Doug Ford’s meddling in our election is allowed to stand, a precedent that municipal voters have no rights would be set. Further, this interpretation could establish case law that further erode the City’s autonomy on other matters. We must fight this decision all the way to the Supreme Court, even if it is too late to change course for the upcoming election.

What do we do next?

First, all Torontonians need to work together to ensure that our democracy can never be trampled over again. Toronto is a 21st century city with almost 3 million people operating under 19th century legislation designed for a largely agrarian society. We cannot continue to operate under this framework.

I moved a motion, supported by my colleagues, at the last Council meeting requesting that the federal government move forward with providing Toronto a City Charter. The full text of the motion is below:

  1. City Council request the Government of Canada to provide a mechanism for the City of Toronto, and other municipal governments, to establish a City Charter that provides authority over “municipal issues” including, but not limited to, the following:
  2. a) Municipal elections
  3. b) Municipal governance structure
  4. c) Local land use and zoning decisions
  5. d) Local financial matters including the power to determine revenue sources, set tax rates, borrow funds, and allocate monies
  6. e) Personnel decisions

What is a City Charter?

  • Common in the United States, and elsewhere, Charter cities have supreme authority over “municipal affairs.”
  • Also referred to as “Home Rule”, a charter city’s law concerning a municipal affair will trump a state law governing the same topic

Charter City Powers

  • According to the National League of Cities (US organization similar to the Federation of Canadian Municipalities) local governments under Home Rule are generally free from State interference in 4 areas:
    • Structural: power to choose the form of government, charter and enact charter revisions
    • Functional: power to exercise local self-government in a broad or limited manner
    • Fiscal: authority to determine revenue sources, set tax rates, borrow funds and other related financial activities
    • Personnel: authority to set employment rules, remuneration rates, employment conditions and collective bargaining

Other Jurisdictions

  • London was first granted a City Charter by Henry I in 1131 providing allowance to choose their own sheriff and judiciary – “no-one else shall be judge over the men of London“:

“Henry, by the grace of God King of England and duke of Normandy, to the archbishop of Canterbury, bishops, abbots, earls, barons, justices, sheriffs and all his loyal subjects, French or English, throughout England, greetings…The citizens may appoint as sheriff whomever they want from among themselves and as judge whomever they want from among themselves to take charge pleas of the crown and supervise their conduct; no-one else shall be judge over the men of London.”

  • Many major American municipalities have had Charters for over a century  providing independence from state government on local matters, including the 4 largest cities:
  • California alone has 121 Charter cities

I will have more to say in the coming weeks on our campaign for a City Charter, and other, more immediate measures, to address the democratic deficit created by the reduction of councillors.

Right now, I need your support in this difficult election. While there are other tools, such as social media, phone banks and direct mail, the most effective method of reaching voters is through knocking on our neighbours’ doors and letting them know how much we have accomplished over the last 8 years and our plans for continuing to improve Midtown and all of Toronto.

Please sign up on my website. I look forward to you joining me out in our community

Sincerely,

Josh

Saliva test for concussion, moon bent and Twin Town, Brazil

The scourge of concussion may be much easier to diagnose and treat quickly as a result of research into a simple saliva test. Remarkable. Then, say hello to Japanese billionaire and artist Yusaku Maezawa, 43, who will be the first revenue service rider on a trip around the moon in 2023. Below that, the mysterious abundance of twins in Cândido Godói, Brazil. It is a village of 7,000 inhabitants populated by descendents of German immigrants and scientists say, not surprisingly, that it must be in the genes. Finally, the Ontario Court of Appeal will decide tomorrow if Doug Ford has violated the rights of Ontarians or merely enacted legislation to make Toronto Council smaller.






Kitchen sink of objections to Better Local Government Act

Lawyers for the City of Toronto have thrown a kitchen sink of objections at the Better Local Government Act, the legislation passed by the Legislature to reduce the size of City Council from 47 sets to 25. Among the arguments are that it’s discriminatory, arbitrary, violates the Constitution, breaches the Charter of Rights and denies effective representation. Ontario Superior Court will hear the arguments Friday and the most tempting prospect is that the court might agree with all of these complaints and still find the Better Local Government Act entirely constitutional. The prospect of a different decision might delight City Council but it seems likely to throw Canada into constitutional confusion. It would require an immediate appeal by the Ontario Government and perhaps set the City and Legislature on the road to the Supreme Court of Canada.

SCOC dismisses bid to keep home prices off Internet

The Toronto Real Estate Board has responded to the decision by the Supreme Court not to grant leave to hear TREB’s appeal. It notes that the order of the Competition Tribunal will come into effect in 60 days time, unless it is modified. The response goes on:

As noted by the Supreme Court of Canada, of the approximately 600 leave
applications submitted to the Court each year, only about 80 are granted. The
possibility of succeeding in getting an appeal heard is in general remote. The
Court’s role is not to correct errors that may have been made in the courts below.
Rather it grants leave only where its decision is likely to have an impact on society
as a whole.

TREB believes personal financial information of home buyers and sellers must
continue to be safely used and disclosed in a manner that respects privacy
interests and will be studying the required next steps to ensure such information
will be protected in compliance with the Tribunal Order once that comes into
effect — John DiMichele, CEO, Toronto Real Estate Board

Feds tell SCOC that sons of sleeper spies are not citizens

The government in Ottawa has argued to the Supreme Court of Canada that the Toronto-born son of Russian intelligence agents should be denied Canadian citizenship, the same exception that applies to any child born in Canada to a foreign diplomat. Canadian Press reports Friday that it has obtained a recently submitted brief attempting to overturn a Federal Court of Appeal ruling that effectively affirmed the Canadian citizenship of Alexander Vavilov and, through a related case, his older brother. Alexander, 24, and Timothy, 28, were born in Canada to parents using the aliases Donald Heathfield and Tracey Ann Foley. They were imprisoned and later deported in a prisoner swap with the Russians. Canadian Press Feds in last-minute bid to deport brothers born to spies

Livingston jailed for 6 months in gas-plant records scandal

David Livingston, chief of staff to ex-Liberal premier Dalton McGuinty, has been sentenced to four months in jail and a year’s probation for deleting documents related to the notorious 2011 gas plant cancellation scandal. It is a sorry day for Livingston, 65, a man of otherwise spotless reputation who was apparently ensnared by his loyalty to Mr. McGuinty. Judge Timothy Lipson said the crime committed was extremely serious. “His conduct was an affront to, and an attack upon, democratic institutions and values,” Lipson said. “An attempt to tamper with the democratic process requires a strong denunciatory response.” The Crown had called for a six-month jail term while the defence had urged a conditional discharge, saying bad publicity has been enough punishment for Mr. Livingston.

BAD JOB REFERENCE IS NOT DEFAMATION

The Ontario Court of Appeal has said that even though the content of a job reference may be defamatory the author is not necessarily liable. In the case of an Ontario woman who sued her former supervisor, the court said such references are protected by the defence of qualified privilege.  “The statements made by the respondent were defamatory but, given that they were made in the context of providing an employment reference, they were subject to a defence of qualified privilege,” the Appeal Court said. “The trial judge also concluded that the plaintiff had failed to prove malice in the making of the statements, so the defence of qualified privilege was not defeated.”

SON OF SLEEPER AGENTS GETS CANADIAN PASSPORT

Alex Vavilov, the son of Russian sleeper agents who have been kicked out of Canada and can never return, has nonetheless been granted a Canadian passport because he was born here. The Supreme Court is reviewing Vavilov’s status but until it returns a decision, he is a Canadian. Fascinating stuff. CBC

PCs will elect new leader March 10 using electronic voting

The Ontario PC Party will pick a new leader Saturday, March 10. five weeks from now. The announcement came Wednesday night after a committee spent the last few days drafting rules, a timeline for the race and how much it will cost. The general election is Thursday, June 7. Rules of the leadership contest will be released Thursday. The election will be on the basis of one member, one vote and use what is being called secure remote electronic voting.

OTHER NEWS

Woman jailed seven years for spiriting child away to China

A woman who spirited her daughter away to China to deny access to her ex husband has been found guilty on appeal and will serve a seven year sentence for kidnapping and obstruction, the Ontario Court of Appeal has decided. Ontario’s top court found that Chun Mei Li has waged a seven-year campaign of deceit and lies in her effort to keep her daughter in China. “The trial judge found that the harm caused by Ms. Li’s actions, when combined with her very high degree of moral blameworthiness, warranted a sentence that was more severe than in comparable cases,” the Appeal Court said. Toronto Sun